From: Health systems resilience in fragile and conflict-affected settings: a systematic scoping review
Study characteristics | Number | References |
---|---|---|
Year of publication | ||
2014 | 1 | [75] |
2015 | 3 | |
2016 | 2 | |
2017 | 9 | |
2018 | 3 | |
2019 | 4 | |
2020 | 6 | |
2021 | 8 | |
2022 | 1 | [61] |
Type of publication | ||
Original research study | 23 | [29, 45,46,47,48,49,50, 52, 54,55,56,57,58, 61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68, 71, 73] |
Commentary/Analysis/Viewpoint | 9 | |
Conference proceeding | 2 | |
Editorial | 1 | [75] |
Policy report | 1 | [69] |
Book chapter | 1 | [59] |
Geographic settinga | ||
FCAS in general | 3 | |
Sub Saharan Africa | 25 | |
West Africa in general | 7 | |
Sierra Leone | 6 | |
Liberia | 6 | |
Nigeria | 2 | |
Congo (DRC) | 2 | |
Cameroon | 1 | [71] |
Sudan | 1 | [73] |
South Sudan | 1 | [55] |
Middle East | 7 | |
Gaza | 1 | [74] |
Iraq | 2 | |
Lebanon | 3 | |
Syria | 1 | [57] |
Southeast Asia | 4 | |
Cambodia | 2 | |
Myanmar | 1 | [49] |
Nepal | 1 | [61] |
Latin America | 1 | |
Haiti | 1 | [52] |
Type(s) of shockb | ||
Infectious disease outbreak | 22 | [1, 2, 29, 47, 48, 50,51,52,53, 58, 60, 62,63,64,65, 68, 69, 71, 72, 75, 76] |
Armed conflict and violence | 17 | [14, 41, 45, 46, 51, 54,55,56,57, 59, 63, 65,66,67,68, 70, 74] |
Natural disaster | 5 | |
Climate hazards | 2 | |
Actors under analysisc | ||
Communities | 4 | |
Public health sector | 24 | [1, 2, 29, 41, 45,46,47, 51, 53,54,55, 58, 60,61,62, 64, 66,67,68,69,70,71,72, 76] |
Private for-profit health sector | 8 | |
Private non-for-profit health sector | 19 | [1, 14, 29, 45, 46, 49, 51, 54, 56, 57, 59, 60, 64,65,66,67, 73,74,75] |
Resilience framework adoptedd | ||
Not specified | 17 | |
Kruk’s characteristics of resilient health systems | 7 | |
Blanchet’s capacity-oriented resilience framework | 5 | |
Others | 9 |