Skip to main content

Table 3 List of statements that did not meet consensus

From: Provision of trauma care in asymmetric warfare: a conceptual framework to support the decision to implement frontline care services

Statement

SD

Consensus

DEFINITION: The utility of the TSP should be considered in all conflict settings even where fighting is sporadic or frontlines are poorly defined

1.6

Not attained

SCOPE: The TSP must be prepared to initially manage acute medical conditions in addition to trauma

1.5

Not attained

SCOPE: Uncomplicated minor injuries can be managed at the TSP

1.9

Not attained

SCOPE: Penetrating and blast injuries should (always) be considered for referral to higher level of care

1.2

Not attained

VARIABLE: Civil-military coordination – Interaction with the military and other armed groups must be established. This relationship is dependent on the medical needs and the roles and responsibilities of the military and other armed groups

1.5

Not attained

VARIABLE: Medical expertise – Capacity and capability of the medical staff should vary within the trauma care system in context with the local health care delivery system

1.1

Not attained