Demographic
|
Value
|
n
|
%
|
---|
Age
|
13–17
|
159
|
100
|
Who story is about
|
About me
|
26
|
16.35
|
About someone in my family
|
26
|
16.35
|
Someone else I know
|
107
|
67.30
|
Sex
|
Male
|
59
|
37.11
|
Female
|
100
|
62.89
|
Income group*
|
Average
|
83
|
52.20
|
Poor
|
61
|
38.36
|
Well-off
|
15
|
9.44
|
Education
|
Some secondary school
|
53
|
33.33
|
Some primary school
|
62
|
38.99
|
None
|
19
|
11.95
|
Completed primary school
|
14
|
8.81
|
Some university
|
4
|
2.52
|
Completed secondary school
|
6
|
3.77
|
Completed technical training
|
1
|
0.63
|
Marital status
|
Single never married
|
152
|
95.60
|
Divorced
|
0
|
0.00
|
Living with partner
|
1
|
0.63
|
Married
|
6
|
3.70
|
Prefer not to say
|
0
|
0.00
|
Separated
|
0
|
0.00
|
Area collected
|
Bukavu
|
46
|
28.93
|
Kalemie
|
13
|
8.18
|
Goma
|
93
|
58.49
|
Kisangani
|
3
|
1.89
|
Beni
|
2
|
1.26
|
Bunia
|
2
|
1.26
|
- *We assessed household income through a proxy measure which asked if the family owned any the following items: (1) mobile phone, (2) radio, (3) generator inverter or sun panel, (4) any type of motorized vehicle, or (5) refrigerator or freezer. Participants could choose as many items as was applicable or they could choose ‘none of the above.’ Income was then categorized as follows: access to none or 1 of the 5 items was rated as ‘poor,’ access to 2 or 3 of the items was rated as ‘average’ and access to 4 or 5 of the items was rated as ‘well-off.’