Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics: Violence against women

From: Mental health of women and children experiencing family violence in conflict settings: a mixed methods systematic review

Author

Country

Study setting (urban/rural)

Nature of conflict

Study design

Sample size (n)

Age of sample

Particular group of focus

Type of Violence and Role of perpetrator

Avdibegovic (2006) [37]

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Urban and Rural

Internationalised intrastate

Cross-sectional study

283

16 + ;43 (9.6)

Women in the general population*

Physical, emotional/ psychological and sexual (domestic violence, sexual abuse, psychological abuse) from husbands

Gupta (2014) [16]

Côte d'Ivoire

Rural

Intrastate

Cross-sectional study

(n) = 950

18 + ; 37.4 (11.4)

Those reported to have a male partner at the time of the survey

IPV, domestic violence and rape from partner

Heath (2012) [26]

Palestine

Rural and urban

Intrastate

Cohort study

N = 746 (n) = 383

18–78; 34.68 (12.19)

Living in the West bank, Gaza strip and East Jerusalem

Domestic violence

Hossain (2014) [39]

Côte d'Ivoire

Rural

Intrastate

Cross-sectional study

N = 2678 (n) = 1411

15–49

Resident in the community for one year and access to the International Rescue Committee (a humanitarian organisation)

Domestic violence, marital rape from partner or family member

Jewkes (2018) [13]

Afghanistan

Rural

Internationalised interstate

Cross-sectional study

(n) = 1463

14–48; 29.28

Women who were interested in participation for interventions

IPV from spouse

Johnson (2010) [44]

Democratic Republic of Congo

Rural

Intrastate

Cross-sectional study

N = 998 (n) = 593

18 + 

Households in the Eastern DRC

Physical and sexual violence from spouse or partner

Kane (2018) [51]

Iraq

Unknown

Internationalised intrastate

Cross-sectional study

N = 894 (n) = 457

35.69 (14.10)

Adults reporting or witnessing one of eight possible traumatic events

Physical violence from partner

Kinyanda (2013) [49]

Uganda

Unknown

Interstate

Cross-sectional study

N = 1568 (n) = 903

15 + 

Non-vulnerable and vulnerable individuals were selected**

IPV from partner or spouse

Kinyanda (2016) [48]

Uganda

Unknown

Interstate

Cross-sectional study

N = 1110 (n) = 694

14 + 

Resident of the 4 sub-counties, within the age range of 14 + , conversant with the Itesot language and would understand the survey

Physical, emotional/psychological and sexual violence from partner or spouse

Rees (2016) [45]

Timor-Leste

Facility-based

Intrastate

Cross-sectional study

(n) = 1672

 < 15 to > 35

Pregnant women in second trimester

IPV from partner

Shuman (2016) [30]

Côte d'Ivoire

Urban

Intrastate

Cross-sectional study

(n) = 80

18 + 

Women from the general population

IPV from partner

Sriskandarajah (2015) [41]

Sri Lanka

Unknown

Intrastate

Cross-sectional study

N = 569 (n) = 122

37.6 (5.6)

Parents of primary school children

Physical, emotional/psychological, sexual violence and IPV from husband

Usta (2008) [50]

Lebanon

Facility-based

Intrastate

Cross-sectional study

(n) = 310

15–72; 36.20 (10.60)

Women from the general population

IPV and domestic violence from husband or family members

Vinck (2013) [38]

Liberia

Rural and urban

Intrastate

Cross-sectional study

N = 4501 (n) = 2196

35.4

Liberian adults

IPV from partner or spouse

  1. *The study included women receiving psychiatric treatment. These women were excluded from our analysis
  2. ** Vulnerable individuals defined as 'A person who had any of the following characteristics: widowed, divorced, or separated; living in an internally displaced persons camp; women who had suffered sexual torture; single mothers; orphans; out of school youth; child/adolescent mothers; women and adolescent girls without any source of livelihood (mainly lack of access to arable land); having a mental health problem; survivor of intimate partner violence; and survivors of recent famines or floods