Skip to main content

Table 3 Point difference between phase 1 and phase 2

From: An assessment of the quality of care provided at primary health care centres in camps for internally displaced persons in Iraq in 2018

Governorate Point difference between phase 1 and phase 2 (phase 2–phase 1)
# Camps difference Index score Environment and safety Client Care Technical competence Management Satisfaction
Anbar − 3 27.1 25.9 30.4 13.7 35.7 30
Dahuk 0 0.9 − 4.6 − 12.2 0 11.5 9.8
Diyala − 2 − 21.7 − 9.2 − 38.1 − 40.9 − 6.1 − 13.9
Erbil − 3 21.8 19.5 21.1 31.9 32.2 4.6
Kirkuk − 1 5.2 16.2 2.3 14.6 − 10.9 4
Ninewa 0 15.1 14.6 17.5 23 10.9 9.6
Salah al-Din 1 − 1.3 7.4 3.8 0.7 − 15.2 − 3.3
Sulaymaniyah 0 12.9 13.3 18.4 14.6 9.4 8.9
Average   7.5 10.4 5.4 7.2 8.4 6.21
Type of supporting organisation        
DOH − 2 2.0 7.8 0.3 2.5 − 4.7 4
INGO − 13 22.2 34.9 28.6 29.5 12 5.8
NGO 7 7.0 0.3 2.8 11.2 11.8 8.7
Average   10.4 14.3 10.6 14.4 23.5 6.4