Table 3 Point difference between phase 1 and phase 2
Governorate | Point difference between phase 1 and phase 2 (phase 2–phase 1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# Camps difference | Index score | Environment and safety | Client Care | Technical competence | Management | Satisfaction | |
Anbar | − 3 | 27.1 | 25.9 | 30.4 | 13.7 | 35.7 | 30 |
Dahuk | 0 | 0.9 | − 4.6 | − 12.2 | 0 | 11.5 | 9.8 |
Diyala | − 2 | − 21.7 | − 9.2 | − 38.1 | − 40.9 | − 6.1 | − 13.9 |
Erbil | − 3 | 21.8 | 19.5 | 21.1 | 31.9 | 32.2 | 4.6 |
Kirkuk | − 1 | 5.2 | 16.2 | 2.3 | 14.6 | − 10.9 | 4 |
Ninewa | 0 | 15.1 | 14.6 | 17.5 | 23 | 10.9 | 9.6 |
Salah al-Din | 1 | − 1.3 | 7.4 | 3.8 | 0.7 | − 15.2 | − 3.3 |
Sulaymaniyah | 0 | 12.9 | 13.3 | 18.4 | 14.6 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
Average | 7.5 | 10.4 | 5.4 | 7.2 | 8.4 | 6.21 | |
Type of supporting organisation | |||||||
DOH | − 2 | 2.0 | 7.8 | 0.3 | 2.5 | − 4.7 | 4 |
INGO | − 13 | 22.2 | 34.9 | 28.6 | 29.5 | 12 | 5.8 |
NGO | 7 | 7.0 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 11.2 | 11.8 | 8.7 |
Average | 10.4 | 14.3 | 10.6 | 14.4 | 23.5 | 6.4 | |