Challenge | Strategies | |
---|---|---|
Ethical | Dismantling power differentials between researchers and vulnerable populations | ▪CBPR to ensure community engagement, co-learning, and involvement |
▪Community advisory boards to reinforce and enrich investigation | ||
Ensuring appropriateness, sensitivity and relevance in local contexts | ▪Employ an ecological approach to investigate individual, family, and community influences | |
▪Mixed-methods to establish culturally meaningful and valid assessments | ||
▪Focus group discussions to refine items and determine cultural appropriateness | ||
▪Develop locally derived measures in close consultation with local staff and community members | ||
Addressing risk of harm cases | ▪Anticipate risk of harm cases and develop rigorous protocols to ensure participant safety, appropriate referrals, and follow-up | |
Capacity/Sustainability | Developing long-term, stable partnerships | ▪Develop a capacity-building core to develop and deliver innovative, locally relevant training and technical assistance programs |
Establishing systems of follow-up | ||
Supporting rather than overburdening professionals | ||
Logistical | Adapting to unforeseen, adverse circumstances | ▪Anticipate and plan for them. When that fails, accept the challenge presented, make appropriate adaptations to the research process and consider opportunities |
Conceptualizations and Assessment of Mental Health in Diverse Cultures and Contexts | Assessing mental health problems, especially in the absence of validated screening tools | ▪Involve local teams in qualitative data collection to understand stigma and co- morbidity and to examine protective processes linked to resilient outcomes |
Addressing stigma around mental health | ▪Use mixed methods models to select, adapt, or create measures of mental health and related constructs | |
Addressing co-morbidity | ||
▪Use psychometric methods to subject tools to rigorous validation, testing and refinement |