Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of 288 articles in review of ethical considerations: author nationality, funding source, investigation design

From: Research ethics and refugee health: a review of reported considerations and applications in published refugee health literature, 2015-2018

Characteristic

N (%)

Investigator’s Home Country, top four and other

 United States

90 (31.3)

 Australia

43 (14.9)

 Germany

16 (5.6)

 Canada

15 (5.2)

 Other

124 (43.1)

Primary Institution

 Academic institution

212 (73.6)

 Medical institution

47 (16.3)

 National government

17 (5.9)

 Nonprofit/nongovernmental organization

7 (2.4)

 State/local government

2 (0.7)

 Other

3 (1.0)

Primary Funding Source

 National government

76 (26.4)

 Academic institution

46 (16.0)

 Nonprofit/nongovernmental organization

31 (10.8)

 Medical institution

21 (7.3)

 Private

14 (4.9)

 State/local government

4 (1.4)

 Other

13 (4.5)

 None

11 (3.8)

 Unknown/not mentioned

72 (25.0)

 Investigation Design

 Cross-sectional

234 (81.3)

 Prospective cohort

29 (10.1)

 Randomized control trial

7 (2.4)

Other

18 (6.3)

 Investigation Type

 Observational

249 (86.5)

 Intervention

39 (13.5)

Time Point in Resettlement Process

 Displaced, refugee camp

64 (22.2)

 Displaced, non-refugee camp (e.g., urban refugee)

31 (10.8)

 Post-resettlement

192 (66.7)

 Both, displaced and post-resettlement

1 (0.3)

 Refugees Classified as Internally Displaced (among those displaced in camp or non-camp setting, n = 96)

7 (7.3)

 Investigation Conducted in Conflict Zone (among displaced in camp or non-camp setting, n = 96)

3 (3.1)