Source, Year | Title | Intended Setting | Intended Stage of Emergency | Number Indicators Included in Mapping by SRMH Domain | Data Sources Used for Indicators | Resources Available | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARH | CAC | FP | GBV | HIV | MH | STI | Facilities | Service Providers | Affected Population | Program Records | Not Specified | |||||
IAWG, 2010 [15] | MISP Indicators | All humanitarian settings | Acute | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | ✓ | ✓ | • Some data collection guidance provided in IAFM manual | |||
IAWG, 2010 [15] | Comprehensive Reproductive Health Service Indicators | All humanitarian settings | Extended | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14 | 4 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | • Some data collection guidance provided in IAFM manual | |
CDC, 2013 [13] | Indicators for Pregnant and Postpartum Women after Disaster | Post-disaster settings in the United States | Acute | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | ✓ | • Extensive data collection guidance and data collection instruments available upon requestc | ||||
Health Information System Standards and Indicators | Camp and urban settingsa | Both | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 19 | 4 | ✓ | • Extensive data collection guidance, data collection instruments, data entry software, and automated analysis available online via UNHCR’s Twine systemd • System for ongoing data collection and reporting • Centralized data repository | |||||
CDC, 2007 [11] | Reproductive Health Assessment Toolkit for Conflict-Affected Women Key Indicator List | Conflict-affected settings | Both | 0 | 0 | 6 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 3 | ✓ | • Extensive data collection guidance, data collection instruments, and analysis guidance available online in Toolkite • Web-based trainings on data collection and data use also available online | ||||
Sphere Project, 2011 [3] | Sphere Standards Indicators | All humanitarian settings | Both | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | ✓ | ✓ | • Some guidance on data collection provided in Sphere Handbook | |||
Response Monitoring Indicator List for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health and Nutrition in Emergencies | All humanitarian settings | Both | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | • Some guidance on data collection provided in Guide to Maternal, Newborn and Child Health and Nutrition in Emergencies | ||
OCHA Indicators Registry | All humanitarian settings | Both | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 0 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | • Guidance on data collection and suggested tools provided for some indicators but not others on registry websitef • Suggested data collection tools include the WHO’s SARAg health facility assessment tool, and the HeRAMSh approach | |||
IAWG, 2017 [16] | MISP Process Evaluation Indicatorsb | All humanitarian settings | Both | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | • Extensive data collection guidance, data collection instruments, and analysis guidance available online in Toolkiti |