Skip to main content

Table 1 Objectives from UNHCR Results Framework used to disaggregate budget

From: Does spending on refugees make a difference? A cross-sectional study of the association between refugee program spending and health outcomes in 70 sites in 17 countries

• Favorable protection environment

• Fair protection processes and documentation

• Security from violence and exploitation

• Community participation and self-management

• Durable solutions

• External relations

• Logistics and operations support

• Headquarters and regional support (excluded because no spending was allocated to this budget category in the 20 included PPGs)

• Basic needs and essential services—further broken down into the following:

 - Water & sanitation (“supply of potable water increased or maintained” and “population lives in satisfactory sanitary conditions”)

 - Education (“population has optimal access to education”)

 - Shelter/infrastructure (“shelter and infrastructure improved”)

 - Non-food items (“population has sufficient basic domestic and hygiene items”)

 - Food security & nutrition (“food security improved” and “nutritional well-being improved”)

 - Healthcare services (“health of the population improves or remains stable” and “risk of HIV/AIDS reduced and quality of response improved”)