Skip to main content

Table 2 General infrastructure (n=63 health facilities)

From: Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: mixed-methods case studies

 

Mean catchment population1

Mean number of beds

At least 1 qualified health provider available 24/7

Functioning power supply

Functioning water supply

Minimum infection prevention supplies2

Burkina Faso (n=28)3

      

Hospital (n=3)

608,320

89

2 (66.7%)

3 (100%)

3 (100%)

1

ND* (1)

Camp health center (n=4)

18,452

6

3 (100%) ND* (1)

2 (66.7%) ND* (1)

4 (100%)

0

ND* (1)

Non-camp health center (n=21)

6,782

10

13 (61.9%)

13 (76.5%) ND* (4)

16 (80%) ND* (1)

5 (23.8%)

DRC (n=26) 4

      

Hospital (n=1)

378,000

171

1

1

1

1

Health center (n=25)

12,870

8

18 (75%)

10 (40%)

14 (56%)

4 (16%)

South Sudan (n=9) 5

      

Hospital (n=1)

209,700

60

ND*

1

1

0

Health center (n=8)

ND*

16 (range 2-67)

1 (12.5%)

4 (50%)

8 (100%)

4 (50%)

  1. *ND = no data
  2. 1 Mean catchment population includes both host and displaced populations with the exception of the camp health facilities in Burkina Faso which served primarily refugees.
  3. 2 See Additional file 1: Appendix A for details on minimum infection prevention supplies.
  4. 3 The MOH manages three hospitals and 21 non-camp health centers while the four camp health centers are NGO-managed. The non-camp health centers primarily serve the host community whereas the camp facilities serve refugees. The hospitals serve both populations.
  5. 4 All facilities from DRC are MOH-managed, but the hospital and 15 health centers received some NGO support for health.
  6. 5 The hospital and one health center are MOH-managed, six health centers are NGO-managed, and one health center is managed by a religious mission.