Table 6 Distribution of mean (SD) of complaint and functional ratings for each project*
Project | Complaint rating | Functional rating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First visit | Last visit | Difference | First visit | Last visit | Difference | |
CAR: Boguila | 2.7 (1.9) | 7.9 (2.2) | 5.2 (2.5) | 4.4 (2.7) | 8.2 (2.2) | 3.9 (2.8) |
Columbia: | ||||||
Norte de Santander | 3.5 (1.7) | 7.0 (1.6) | 3.5 (1.9) | 5.0 (2.4) | 7.4 (1.9) | 2.4 (1.8) |
Sucre Bolivar | 3.2 (2.4) | 7.3 (2.6) | 4.0 (2.6) | 3.3 (2.5) | 7.3 (2.6) | 4.0 (2.7) |
Uraba | 2.7 (1.4) | 7.4 (2.3) | 4.7 (2.6) | 3.4 (1.7) | 7.0 (2.3) | 3.6 (2.9) |
DRC: | ||||||
Dubie | 2.0 (0.9) | 6.2 (2.5) | 4.2 (2.6) | 3.1 (1.7) | 6.6 (2.4) | 3.5 (2.5) |
Kitchanga | 2.2 (1.0) | 8.8 (1.4) | 6.6 (1.7) | 3.5 (1.4) | 9.1 (1.3) | 5.6 (1.7) |
Mweso | 1.4 (0.7) | 5.9 (2.1) | 4.5 (2.1) | 1.7 (1.0) | 6.1 (2.0) | 4.4 (2.1) |
Shamwana | 1.9 (0.6) | 7.3 (1.6) | 5.4 (1.7) | 3.1 (1.1) | 7.6 (1.6) | 4.6 (1.8) |
India: | ||||||
Kupwara | 3.6 (1.2) | 6.2 (1.8) | 2.7 (1.5) | 3.7 (1.2) | 6.6 (1.6) | 2.8 (1.6) |
Srinagar | 2.0 (0.8) | 6.3 (2.3) | 4.3 (2.2) | 2.4 (0.9) | 6.8 (2.1) | 4.4 (2.1) |
Manipur | 2.6 (1.7) | 5.8 (2.4) | 3.2 (2.5) | 3.2 (2.1) | 6.2 (2.4) | 3.0 (2.4) |
Iraq: Baghdad | 2.7 (1.1) | 7.3 (1.6) | 4.6 (2.0) | 2.8 (1.0) | 7.4 (1.7) | 4.6 (1.9) |
Pakistan: | ||||||
Chaman | 4.4 (1.5) | 7.6 (2.5) | 3.2 (2.2) | 4.6 (1.4) | 7.6 (2.4) | 3.0 (2.3) |
Quetta | 2.7 (1.3) | 8.1 (2.3) | 5.3 (2.4) | 4.3 (1.7) | 8.5 (2.0) | 4.2 (2.3) |
Papua New Guinea: | ||||||
Lae | 3.4 (1.8) | 6.0 (2.4) | 2.6 (2.6) | 4.3 (2.2) | 6.5 (2.4) | 2.2 (2.6) |
Tari | 3.2 (1.3) | 6.4 (2.3) | 3.2 (2.2) | 4.0 (1.8) | 6.7 (2.1) | 2.7 (2.3) |
Russia: | ||||||
Chechnya | 2.4 (0.7) | 7.9 (1.1) | 5.5 (1.2) | 2.7 (0.9) | 8.2 (1.0) | 5.5 (1.2) |
Ingushetia | 2.2 (1.1) | 7.4 (1.3) | 5.2 (1.5) | 3.1 (1.5) | 7.8 (1.4) | 4.7 (1.4) |
Overall | 2.6 (1.4) | 7.3 (2.1) | 4.7 (2.4) | 3.4 (1.7) | 7.6 (2.1) | 4.2 (2.3) |