Skip to main content

Table 4 Critical review criteria (results and interpretation) and results of three reviewed surveys

From: Learning lessons from field surveys in humanitarian contexts: a case study of field surveys conducted in North Kivu, DRC 2006-2008

 

Survey

(Ref)

 
 

1

(14)

2

(15)

3

(16)

 
    

Criteria

Results

Participants

✓

✓

✓

a) Report number of individuals surveyed

 

✓

✓

✓

b) Report non-participation (refusals)

 

✓

✓

✓

c) Report number of households surveyed

 

✓

✓

✓

d) Give characteristics of survey participants (e.g. demographic, clinical, social)

 

✗

✗

✓

e) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of interest

Main Results

✓

✓

✓

Summarize key results with reference to survey objectives

 

✓

✓

✓

a) Provide estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence interval with design effect if cluster based sampling).

 

✗

✗

✗

b) Report causes of death

 

✗

✗

✗

c) Report absolute numbers of deaths

 

✗

✗

✗

d) Report absolute numbers of other variables of interest

Limitations

✗

✗

✗

Discuss limitations of the survey, taking into account sources of potential bias or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential bias

Interpretation

    

Interpretation

✓

✓

✓

Give an overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, results from similar surveys, and other sources of information

Generalisability

✗

✗

✗

Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results

Funding

✓

✓

✓

State the funding source for the survey

Conflict of interest statement

✗

✗

✗

Provide statement concerning conflict of interests and if none, state this.

Follow-up

✗

✗

✓

State to whom these results will be provided

Recommendations

✓

✓

✓

Provide recommendations on a course(s) of action based on interpretation of findings